Poor lighting hides danger. In a dim parking lot, a pothole looks like a shadow. On a dark stairwell, a broken tread blends into the step below it. Underlit areas increase the chance of trips, missteps, collisions with unseen hazards, and even crime. When injuries result, the question becomes who is responsible and how to prove it.
Why lighting levels matter for safety
Light is not just for comfort. Adequate illumination lets people see hazards in time to avoid them, read signs, detect surface changes, and judge depth on stairs. In parking areas, lighting also supports safety by improving visibility of pedestrians, vehicles, and obstacles. In stairwells, lighting is part of the life-safety system: without it, depth perception suffers and missteps rise.
Industry references offer typical lighting ranges for these spaces. For parking facilities, recommended levels often fall in fractional foot-candles for open lots, with higher levels at entrances, exits, and pedestrian routes. For paths of egress inside buildings, building codes call for brighter and more uniform illumination along the walking surface. The precise numbers vary by standard and application, but the message is consistent: when illumination drops below recognized targets, risks go up.
How inadequate lighting causes injuries
Underlit areas create predictable hazards:
When injuries occur in these conditions, the lighting is often a key part of the story—either as the primary hazard or as a factor that made another hazard unavoidable.
Premises liability basics: the duty to keep areas reasonably safe
Property owners and those in control of property have a duty to keep areas reasonably safe for lawful visitors. The duty is highest for business visitors (customers, clients, delivery drivers) and includes inspecting for hazards, fixing problems in a reasonable time, and warning about dangers that are not obvious. In rental properties and multi-tenant buildings, both the property owner and a manager or maintenance contractor may share responsibility for common areas like lots, garages, and stairwells.
Lighting fits squarely within this duty. If a parking lot light does not come on at dusk, if a bank of garage fixtures has failed, or if a stairwell has burned-out bulbs for weeks, the owner or manager should address the problem in a reasonable time. Failing to do so can support a negligence claim when injuries follow.
What you must prove in an inadequate lighting claim
Every case is different, but most under-lighting claims focus on four elements:
“Notice” is often the key fight. Proof can include prior complaints, work orders, maintenance logs, security rounds, camera footage that shows the lights were out on prior nights, or testimony from residents and employees. In a garage or large lot, a string of burned-out fixtures for days or weeks can establish that the problem existed long enough that a reasonable inspection would have caught it.
Parking lots: common lighting failures and who may be liable
Open lots and garages produce recurring patterns:
Potential defendants include the property owner, a third-party manager, and the lighting or maintenance contractor responsible for inspections and repairs. In shared complexes, a master association may control the lot; in retail settings, a single store might control only the area near its entrance while a landlord controls the rest. Sorting out who controls which part of the lot is a crucial early step.
Stairwells: life-safety lighting and egress rules
Stairwells are not just another interior space. They are part of a building’s means of egress. Building codes call for minimum illumination along the egress path and require emergency lighting that activates on power loss for a defined time. When stair lighting fails—or when fixtures are so dim that the code minimums are not met—falls become far more likely, and evacuation can become dangerous during outages.
Common failures include burned-out bulbs left unattended, broken fixtures never replaced, occupancy sensors set to turn off too quickly, and poor maintenance of emergency lighting batteries. In multi-story buildings and parking garages, inadequate stair lighting is a recurrent cause of serious falls.
Negligent security claims tied to poor lighting
Lighting is also a core element of site security. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) emphasizes visibility, clear sightlines, and adequate illumination to increase the chance that harmful acts will be seen and deterred. In claims involving assaults or robberies in dark lots or garages, poor lighting often appears alongside other lapses, such as broken access gates, unsecured doors, or a lack of patrols. These cases can involve both premises liability (unsafe condition) and negligent security (failure to take reasonable protective measures in the face of foreseeable risk).
“Foreseeability” matters. If a lot or garage has a history of incidents, if nearby areas see repeated crime, or if lighting surveys flagged dark zones that were never corrected, a negligent security claim becomes stronger.
Public property: special rules and deadlines may apply
Falls and assaults can also happen in publicly owned lots, structures, and stairwells. Claims against government entities often have special rules, including notice requirements and damages limits. Proving that a public entity had notice of dark conditions and failed to act can be more technical than in private cases. Early legal guidance is important, because deadlines in public-entity claims are typically shorter than the standard personal injury statute of limitations.
Evidence that strengthens an inadequate lighting claim
The strongest claims combine clear documentation with reliable measurements and expert analysis. Helpful evidence includes:
Defenses you should expect
Property owners and contractors often respond with familiar arguments:
What to do after an injury in a dark lot or stairwell
How legal teams prove inadequate lighting
A thorough team will:
Well-documented cases often resolve without trial because the facts are clear and hard to dispute.
Local help when you need it
Under-lighting cases turn on details: who controlled the lights, how long the fixtures were out, whether inspections were done, and what the light levels were along the path you used. Gathering that proof quickly makes the difference.
For more than 40 years, Metzger & Kleiner, Attorneys at Law, has represented injured people in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania’s Lehigh Valley. The firm investigates fast, secures records before they are lost, and works with lighting and safety experts when needed. With convenient offices, Spanish-language services in the Lehigh Valley, and contingency fees, clients pay no attorney fees unless there is a settlement or verdict. To discuss your options, call 215-567-6616 in Philadelphia or 610-435-7400 in the Lehigh Valley.
Potholes, loose gravel, and stray cargo are more than annoyances. They can cause blown tires,…
When you are injured on the job or because of someone else’s negligence, one of…
After an injury, you face medical bills, time off work, and stress. You also face…
After an accident, your medical records are some of the most important evidence in your…
After a serious accident, most injury victims expect the insurance company to cover their losses…
The Role of Expert Witnesses in Strengthening Your Personal Injury Claim When you’re hurt because…