Though most personal injury lawsuits are based on a legal theory of negligence, or breach of a duty to use reasonable care, there are also instances where an injured person may seek compensation based on a theory of “strict liability.” We discussed the concept of strict liability in greater detail in another blog. In this article, we’ll look at the potential defenses that may be asserted in a strict liability claim. Contact a Philadelphia personal injury attorney with questions about your personal injury claim.
With a lawsuit based on strict liability, there’s typically a statute, or written law, that identifies the requirements that must be shown to successfully recover compensation. As a general rule, there’s no need to show negligence or carelessness in a strict liability context. However, a defendant can argue:
At Metzger & Kleiner, our personal injury lawyers offer a free initial consultation to every client. For an appointment, contact our office online or call us at 215-567-6616 in Philadelphia, 610-435-7400 in the Lehigh Valley, or toll free at 866-847-4170.
We take all personal injury claims on a contingency basis. We will only bill you attorney fees if we recover compensation for your losses.
A parking barrier can strike a driver, cyclist, motorcyclist, or pedestrian when sensors, timing, maintenance,…
A delivery crash can involve a driver, employer, contractor, platform, fleet owner, or loader. Route…
Temporary stages can expose guests, performers, and workers to falls, collapse, and falling equipment. Liability…
A store customer injured by an automatic door may have claims involving the property owner,…
Falling brick, tools, concrete, or construction waste can cause devastating injuries. A Philadelphia claim may…
An e-bike battery fire may involve a manufacturer, seller, repair shop, commercial operator, or property…